Does the response ‘I am offended’ show how narcissistic the Western world has become?
GamingToday, the mainstream media routinely cover cases where someone has been offended by something. Sometimes what has happened can get a good amount of attention, and at other times it can get a small amount of attention.
But, while this source generally covers cases that have taken place for a while, one can browse through a social media site to see how it happens in real time. Here, one can instantly find out what has caused another person to be offended.
Two worlds
If the mainstream media is reporting something, you can relate to what has happened online or offline. Similarly, if someone online is offended by something, it could be because of what happened online or offline.
What this shows, then, is that someone doesn’t need to be around other people to be nervous about something. Therefore, someone could go to a completely isolated place, but as long as they have a device, something will interrupt their inner peace.
Inevitable
One way of looking at this would be to say that being offended is simply part of life and that the world will not line up the way they think it should be. With this in mind, it will be a total waste of time and energy for someone to continually worry about things.
Behaving in this way can prevent them from using their time and energy to make the world a better place. It will be as if someone else is telling them to jump and jump almost always, with absolutely no control over themselves.
Self-reflection
Therefore, if someone values their time and energy, they will see how useless it is to feel offended all the time. If, for example, something in particular is bothering you, you could spend your time and energy doing something about it.
Then you can do something constructive with your time on this earth, rather than allowing your environment to spoil you. This will allow them to be a cause and not a mere effect.
The modern perspective
However, although the world is not perfect and there will always be things that cause annoyance, there are many people in the western world who are unable to accept this. As a result of this, they will believe that the world should always align with their vision of how it should be.
Being so idealistic and not having a perspective that is based on reality, it will be normal for them to give up. So how they feel will typically be defined by what is happening externally.
Analogy
In a way, it will be as if they walk barefoot on a floor full of large and small nails. There will be things big and small that will bring you up, which will make it difficult for you to feel at peace.
If they walked on nails, it would be essential that they put something on their feet; this might not eliminate all the hassles, but it would certainly make a difference. Similarly, having a more distant approach to life will not make you immune to what’s going on around you, but it will almost certainly have a positive effect on your well-being.
Absorbed
Based on how they behave, you can show that they believe the world should revolve around them and that they shouldn’t have to adapt to the world around them. If this is the case, one likely has an inflated sense of importance.
On the other hand, if you didn’t have a grandiose sense of importance or even felt that you were not important, you probably wouldn’t expect the world to be like this. Everything will focus on their needs, and they will give little thought to the needs of others.
Unilateral
It will be up to other people to make sure they don’t say or do anything that has a negative effect on them. What this probably means is that they won’t give much thought to the effect this would have on free speech.
Controlling what other people can and cannot do may allow them to feel better, but this will most likely end up having a negative effect on their life as well. Their ability to express themselves would be severely restricted and they soon realized that they were living in a prison without bars.
Consequent thinking
One of their greatest needs will be to live in a world where nothing bothers them, and this will basically be a sterile world. One way to imagine this would be to think of a world that only contains soft things and has nothing that is hard or sharp.
It will be a comfortable world, that’s for sure, but it will be a totally bleak world. Thanks to being so consumed by their own feelings, it will prevent them from being able to empathize with others and reflect on the impact this would have on their fellow citizens who have views that are not consistent with what is considered acceptable. .
Socially acceptable behavior
What can make it even more difficult for someone to realize how destructive it is for them to try to control what other people say and do is that this type of behavior is supported by different parts of society. Ironically, numerous universities and colleges are happy to restrict freedom of speech.
So this amounts to someone going to a gym to get fit, only to be told that they are not allowed to use any of the equipment. If a university / college restricts what someone can or cannot say to ensure that no one else is offended, would it be correct to say that it has abandoned the principles on which it was founded?
Conclution
It would be easy to say that the attack on free speech is being instigated by narcissistic people, but it is not that black and white. Another thing to keep in mind is the fact that certain elements of society encourage this type of behavior.
If there was no support at the top, this type of behavior would not be taken seriously. The question is: are people like this being used to lead citizens down a certain path? If they are simply pawns, what is the end of the game?